Autonomy in Complexity: Cognitive Superiority of Human-Autonomy Systems

dc.contributor.authorNorlander, Arne
dc.contributor.otherRabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
dc.contributor.otherNORSECON AB, Stockholm, Sweden
dc.contributor.otherEuropean Defence Agency, Bruxelles / Brussel, Belgium
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-06T12:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-22
dc.descriptionReferences: 52
dc.description.abstractThis article introduces the concept of Cognitive Superiority in Emergent, Dynamic, Global, and Evolutionary (EDGE) operations, addressing a critical requirement for Human-Autonomy Systems (HAS) to achieve cognitive superiority in increasingly complex and high-entropy environments. HAS constitute hybrid (artificial and natural) capability elements, each one in need of a level of cognitive fitness that can sustain comprehensive operational situation understanding in the long term. EDGE operations rely on the orchestration of cognitive superiority within human-autonomy collectives, facilitated by high-fidelity sensing, processing, and proactive influence of multidimensional operational variables. By defining Cognitive Superiority as an aggregate of capability elements across human and artificial agents, the paper outlines a technology-agnostic Mission System Architecture (MSA). Traditional military orchestration of operations often suffers from brittleness and catastrophic failure due to its reliance on closed-system logic and a lack of requisite variety. In contrast, this research proposes a shift toward cognitive systemic action, leveraging the Joint Cognitive Command and Influence System (JC2IS) and eight core cognitive functions to sustain comprehensive Situational Understanding. This framework facilitates Human-Autonomy Command (HAC), enabling the HAS-enabled force to navigate stochastic mission perturbations through adaptation, exaptation, and learning, thereby ensuring mission success.en
dc.description.sponsorshipRabdan Academy, United Arab Emirates
dc.description.sponsorshipNORSECON AB, Sweden
dc.description.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11574666/
dc.format.extent95814-95829
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3706306
dc.identifier.issn21693536
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.otherScopus EID: 2-s2.0-105043501065
dc.identifier.otherScopus ID: 105043501065
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3706306
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarlyworks.ra.ac.ae/handle/123456789/2523
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2022).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2023).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2024.2445491
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107574
dc.relation.isreferencedbyEndsley (2015).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyEndsley (2015).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5851
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817743223
dc.relation.isreferencedbyRasmussen (1994).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyVernon (2014).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.1994.3.2
dc.relation.isreferencedbyNorlander (n.d.). Cognitive systems modeling and analysis of command & control systems.
dc.relation.isreferencedbyWorm (2000).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-025-00075-x
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3571225
dc.relation.isreferencedbyNorlander (2024). Human-autonomy command: Leading and harmonizing humans and artificial agents as cognitive capabilities. *Annals of C2. The Hague, Netherlands: NATO Command and Control Center of Excellence (C2CoE)*.
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2023).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2024).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9646-y
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315568119-2
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2022).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60184-3
dc.relation.isreferencedbyMalone (2018).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyBeer (1985).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1109/RASSE64357.2024.10773708
dc.relation.isreferencedbyPigeau (2002). Re-conceptualizing command and control. *Can. Mil. J.*, *3*(1), 53.
dc.relation.isreferencedbyTeske (n.d.). Decoupling command from control—Making the term C2 stronger.
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_12
dc.relation.isreferencedbyPigeau (2001). What is a military commander?.
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2022).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2020).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2017).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2019).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2021).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837403
dc.relation.isreferencedbyHaddad (2025).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(2016).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.25088/ComplexSystems.29.2.107
dc.relation.isreferencedbyLuhmann (1995).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyKnight (1921).
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006552
dc.relation.isreferencedbyShannon (1949).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyWiener (1965).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyReason (1997).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyNorlander (2026). A future system: Human-autonomy command of emergent, dynamic, global and evolutionary (EDGE) operations. *Defence Studies*, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2026.2671054
dc.relation.isreferencedby(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164500-23
dc.relation.isreferencedbyBaezner (2017).
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceIEEE Access
dc.source.urihttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105043501065
dc.subjectEmbodied and Extended Cognition
dc.subjectInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
dc.subjectFree Will and Agency
dc.subjectAutonomy
dc.subjectCognition
dc.titleAutonomy in Complexity: Cognitive Superiority of Human-Autonomy Systemsen
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.endPage95829
oaire.citation.startPage95814
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7481-1768

Files