Adaptive Measurement Noise for Robust Kalman Filtering in Smart Beehive Telemetry

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

IEEE Access

Journal ISSN

2169-3536, 2169-3536

Volume Title

Issue

Pages

82492-82508

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Language

DOI

10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3697308

Abstract

Honeybee colony monitoring generates multimodal, non-stationary telemetry streams that require reliable recursive state estimation with well-calibrated uncertainty for digital apiculture. Although Kalman filtering is widely used in environmental monitoring, adaptive measurement-noise modeling has not been systematically evaluated for smart-hive telemetry under leak-free chronological protocols. The approach performs online measurement-noise covariance adaptation using innovation statistics identified as the primary source of calibration improvement, while an innovation-based normalized innovation squared (NIS) gate serves as a secondary robustness safeguard against rare extreme observations. The framework is benchmarked against fixed-noise linear Kalman filtering, the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF), and ARIMA/SARIMAX baselines, with EKF and EnKF included primarily as stability reference baselines. Experiments are conducted using a strictly chronological train–validation–test replay protocol with one step-ahead forecasting on longitudinal data from instrumented honeybee colonies. Model performance is assessed using predictive accuracy, probabilistic calibration and innovation-based consistency diagnostics. Validation-based sensitivity and ablation analyses are included to evaluate robustness and to distinguish the contribution of adaptive measurement-noise estimation from the auxiliary robustness role of the normalized innovation squared (NIS) gating mechanism.

Description

References: 35

Citation

Rights

Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND

Funding

Editors

ORCID

0000-0002-9768-4925
0000-0001-9247-4374

References

(2016).


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100726


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010070


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0298-x


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106604


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107906


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2008055


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092726


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008967


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.08.011


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083920


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107589


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7040168


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66115-5


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028


Box (2015).


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552


Jazwinski (1970).


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-15-0440.1


Sage (n.d.). Adaptive filtering with unknown prior statistics.


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1970.1099422


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2982407


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2571


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301597


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03695-1


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081740


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44718-y


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.003


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13194013


(n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Open Access